You can help Zimbabwe says opposition MP

Sydneyanglicans.net

An opposition MP challenging the policies of Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe is calling on Sydney Anglicans to help fight the abuse of human rights.

The spokesperson on justice and legal affairs for the Zimbabwean Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), Mr David Coltart, spoke at St Swithun’s, Pymble, on Friday night, asking the diocese to partner with churches in Zimbabwe as they support the work of human rights organisations.

“We have a unique cocktail of the highest incidence of AIDS in the world yet the least amount of money per capita spent on AIDS by a government,” Mr Coltart says.

“We have four million Zimbabweans suffering malnutrition and we have had 300,000 people rendered homeless in the space of two months in the middle of winter.”

Since May 19, the Mugabe government has bulldozed shantytowns, markets and other structures deemed illegal as part of its ‘drive out the filth’ campaign.

“James Morris, director of the World Food Program, told the United Nations three weeks ago that this is the worst humanitarian crisis in the world today,” Mr Coltart says.

“Worse than Darfur and worse than Afghanistan.”

A committed Christian, Mr Coltart attends the Whitestone Chapel church in Bulawayo, a church partnered and planted by St Swithun’s, Pymble.

The Rector of Swithun’s, the Rev Roger Chilton has returned from a recent mission trip to the church.

“Christians there are starting to lose hope,” Mr Chilton says.

“They have prayed for a long time for change, that eventually Mugabe would bow to pressure from within and outside of Zimbabwe, but he has stayed on and the situation has worsened.”

Mr Coltart says the Bible helps him make sense of the current situation in Zimbabwe.

“We are in a situation described in Romans chapter one where the Lord has actually given people over and they have reached that awful situation in their own lives where they don’t even know the extent of their own evil,” he says.

“This is a major issue and we need the church in Australia to mobilise and bring pressure to bear on the Australian government. We need the media to educate Australians about what is going on.

“Just as Australia mobilised on the issue of apartheid, so Australia needs to mobilise around this issue.”

Mr Coltart says there are practical things Sydney Anglicans can do to assist the Zimbabwean churches.

“Churches can adopt a church in Bulawayo or Harare; church organisations can write about what is going on; denominations can feed money to their sister churches; and churches here can invite people from churches in Zimbabwe to alert Australians to what is going on,” he says.

The National Council of Churches in Australia is supporting the Zimbabwe Council of Churches in its calls to the Mugabe government to abide by the rule of law.

The General Secretary of the NCCA, the Rev John Henderson, says the NCCA’s Christian World Service will do what it can to help the Zimbabwean population.

“We call upon the government of Zimbabwe to heed the call of God, of the people, and of the nations of the world to change its course, and ensure future fair and democratic processes,” Mr Henderson says.

Posted in Press reports | Leave a comment

Under Siege: Human rights and the rule of law in Zimbabwe

Speech delivered at the Monash University Law Chambers, Castan Centre for Human Rights Law Lecture

Good evening everyone. It’s very heart-warming to see the magnificent turn out for a country which, after all, is located in the forgotten continent and a country that doesn’t have any oil or anything else like that to attract the attention of the international community. I would like to speak to you tonight about the current human rights situation in Zimbabwe and the erosion of the rule of law that has taken place in Zimbabwe since the year 2000.

In addressing this topic I am aware that in the course of the last five years many Australians have been focused on Zimbabwe but sadly often for the wrong reasons. The debate appears to turn around whether or not the Australian cricket team should tour Zimbabwe or whether that tour should be reciprocated and much of the human rights focus has been centred on the plight of white commercial farmers who have been evicted from their farms. Sadly I think that focus is itself an indictment of the media and perhaps of politicians not just in Australia but elsewhere because there is this preoccupation on those issues. But in reality the human rights situation in Zimbabwe deals with far more serious issues than cricket. The focus of human rights organisations should be on issues that involve, in my view, crimes against humanity and in the early 1980’s genocide.

To understand the current human rights situation in Zimbabwe one has to consider the historical context. What I’d like to do at the outset before I go to detail the current situation is to paint a thumbnail sketch of the human rights history in Zimbabwe since 1980. I divide it into four broad chapters, the first concerns the period immediately after independence the period 1980 through to 1982 which I would describe as the honeymoon period. Sadly many in the international community see what has happened in the last five years as an aberration. They are surprised by what has happened and they point to this honeymoon period; this period Zanu PF and Robert Mugabe when surprised the world. In 1980 Robert Mugabe confounded the international community when he announced his policy of reconciliation which accommodated the white minority and which brought to an end a bloody chapter in Zimbabwe’s history. And rightfully the world embraced Mugabe for that; the world recognised that that policy of reconciliation would play a vital role in bringing apartheid to an end.

Under Seige – Human Rights and the Rule of Law

Posted in Downloadable documents, Speeches | Leave a comment

Zimbabwe opposition calls for Australian support

ABC Online
Presenter: Liam Bartlett

Zimbabwe’s main opposition party has called on Australia to use its influence with the United States, Britain and Asia to indict dictator Robert Mugabe for crimes against humanity.

David Coltart is the spokesperson for justice from the Movement for Democratic Change in Zimbabwe is currently touring the Eastern States of Australia.

He says Mugabe has displaced more than 300,000 people since the 19th May in what is called Operation Clean-Up. This contravenes Article 7 of the Treaty of Rome. The scale of this crime is such that Mr Coltart believes it merits an international intervention in the form of an indictment before the international criminal court.

Not surprisingly, he says, Zimbabwe has not ratified the Treaty of Rome so “any indictment would have to come through a resolution of the Security Council.” Australia doesn’t have a seat on the council but Mr Coltart says he recognises that Australia does exercise great influence and that we occupy a unique position in that we are not a colonial or imperialistic power.

It is true that there have been a number of grave violations of human rights since Zimbabwe’s independence, Mr Coltart reflects, including the massacre of 20,000 people in the South West during the period 1983-7, but those violations are so old now that he believes it would be hard to rally international support around those issues.

He says this recent displacement of people and massive destruction of homes and businesses are clearly targetted at supporters of the opposition in the March 2005 elections.

So does Mr Coltart fear repercussions when he returns to the Zimbabwe Parliament? He says he has already said all of this in the Parliament and any profile he creates here will in some way help protect him and his family when he returns.

More recently, Mugabe has gone to South Africa for financial help. Mr Coltart says it is clear that South African President Mbeke’s policy of quiet diplomacy has not worked in the past three years and it is time for him to change tack.

He says this new deal is very worrying and his party will be watching to see if South Africa will make the one billion rand line of credit available to Mugabe. He says it’s likely that if President Mbeke does make it available he will attach conditions but Mr Coltart is concerned they will not be able to ensure that those conditions are adhered to.

Mr Coltart says that Mugabe is driven by fear and because he is now so distant from his people he can act in such a callous way.

Posted in Press reports | Leave a comment

Statement of David Coltart : MDC National Executive meeting – 15 July 2005

I regret that I am unable to attend the meeting. However I am of the view that the topic being discussed at this meeting is of such great importance to the future of the MDC that I have requested that this statement be read out on my behalf at the meeting.

The MDC’s commitment to nonviolence, demonstrated so powerfully in the last six years, has earned us deep respect both within Zimbabwe and internationally. It has ensured that we command the moral high ground. It has also been our most powerful weapon against ZANU PF as we have been determined not to fight them on ground they are familiar with.

The attempted murder of the Director for Security last year and the assaults on loyal members of staff in May constitute the most serious assault on the credibility of the MDC since it was established in September 1999. These actions have already seriously undermined the credibility of the MDC.

I believe that our commitment to nonviolence is so fundamental that extraordinary measures need to be taken in dealing with this scourge. If we do not send out a clear and unequivocal message to Zimbabweans in general and in particular to our own members and staff that violence will not be tolerated then we will simply reduce the standing of the MDC to that of our opposition ZANU PF.

Zimbabweans are looking for a new beginning. They are looking for a break from the past; a past that is littered with violence. Violence has been used for over 100 years in this country to achieve political objectives and more than anything else it is responsible for the catastrophic state we find our country in today.

At the meeting of the National Council held on the 25th of June a report was tabled by the Management Committee recommending the expulsion of a variety of people found to be involved in the acts of violence that have beset the MDC in the last six months. It is important that those recommendations be implemented immediately.

However, I cannot believe that the youths involved in these despicable acts acted independently. It is common cause that they were unemployed and it is equally clear that they had access to substantial funding. That money must have come from people with access to resources. The instructions to act must have come from people within the Party as no-one else would have the detailed knowledge the youths had access to. In expelling the youths and relatively low ranking members of the security team we have only dealt with the symptoms of the problem, not its root cause.

I am not privy to the evidence that was considered by the Management Committee in making its report. It is abundantly clear to me that the Management Committee either did not manage to find out who instigated these acts of violence or it chose not to reveal those responsible. I cannot believe the latter. However, whatever the case the fact is that there has been an inadequate investigation into who was behind the violence.

At the National Council meeting on the 25th of June it was suggested that concerns regarding “grey areas” (in essence meaning the investigation into who was behind these acts) should be directed to the Secretary General for the Management Committee to investigate. In my view that is an unacceptable method of handling this problem.

Regrettably, it is clear to me that the Management Committee itself is not of one mind regarding this issue. Because of that alone it was an inappropriate organ of the Party to conduct these investigations. It is common cause that the principal reason behind the violence was an alleged power struggle within the Management Committee. For that reason alone the Management Committee should not have conducted the investigation. They were in fact judges in their own cause. Furthermore it seems to me that Article 10 of the Constitution was breached in that the Disciplinary Committee was not asked to investigate the issue. Of course I recognise that the Vice President is also Chairperson of the Disciplinary Committee and to that extent it would also be inappropriate for him to sit on the Disciplinary Committee. However, I see no reason why he could not have recused himself and the investigation could have been conducted by the other 3 members.

The fact remains that in terms of our Constitution it is the Disciplinary Committee that should investigate this matter and make recommendations in terms of Article 10 to reprimand, fine, suspend or expel any members found guilty of conduct unbecoming and prejudicial to the interests or reputation of the Party.

I believe that any member of the MDC or staff member who is found to have been involved in any way, either directly or indirectly, with these acts of violence should be expelled from the party. At the National Council meeting I noted that at least one member of staff was found to be sympathetic to the youths guilty of acts of violence. In my view there is no place in the MDC for any people who are even willing to consider using violence as a means to achieve political ends. In stating this I should stress that we are not bound by any criminal or civil law burdens of proof. This is an extremely important issue and if any reliable evidence is found connecting any person in any way with these vile acts then they should be expelled. If we do not send such a clear and unequivocal message then we will forfeit the moral high ground we have occupied.

Accordingly I propose that the Disciplinary Committee should immediately be tasked with conducting a thorough, and urgent, investigation to establish who was behind the acts of violence.

Sadly this issue has already been very divisive. At the conclusion of the National Council meeting the President appeared to announce that the Management Committee was going to be dissolved. It is important to remember that the establishment of the Management Committee was a decision of the National Executive, which delegated its administrative authority of the Party to the Management Committee. Accordingly, it is only the National Executive that can revoke the establishment of the Management Committee. Likewise it is only the National Executive that has the authority to reconfigure the Management Committee.

It is apparent to me that all is not well within the Management Committee. Whilst that may be the case it seems to me that the Management Committee has an obligation to resolve whatever differences exist amongst them. In this regard the President and the Vice President have a particularly important role to play in uniting the Management Committee. If this unity cannot be achieved then clearly the only other option open to us is to revert to monthly meetings of the National Executive Committee in terms of Articles 5.4.7. and 5.4.8.

The National Executive Committee is comprised of 22 members and one half of its membership shall constitute a quorum. In other words it should not place too much of the burden on the party for the National Executive Committee to meet in this way.

What is abundantly clear is that any other arrangement will be unconstitutional.

Accordingly, I propose that the present Management Committee should be retained. If that is found by the meeting to be impractical then the original resolution delegating authority to the Management Committee should be revoked and the Party should be run by the National Executive Committee henceforth.

I am deeply concerned about the persistent allegations that Morgan Tsvangirai’s leadership of the MDC is under threat and that Welshman Ncube is vying to be President. This of course has been a persistent line taken by The Herald for several years and no doubt is a tactic of ZANU PF. Anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence will know that there are only two people at present in Zimbabwe who have sufficient name recognition and national support to run effectively for President, namely Robert Mugabe and Morgan Tsvangirai. Within the MDC only Morgan Tsvangirai has sufficient stature to contest the presidency. Welshman Ncube knows that; I know that. Those within the party who seriously suggest that Morgan Tsvangirai’s presidency is under threat are either being deliberately mischievous or simply do not understand basic political reality within Zimbabwe.

In this regard I conclude with an appeal to President Morgan Tsvangirai. The present dispute in essence is rooted in the allegation that your presidency is under threat. It is not; at least it is not from the likes of Welshman Ncube who is far too intelligent to entertain any thoughts of seeking the presidency. Ironically the greatest threat to your presidency comes from the very people who are apparently suggesting that somebody else wants the job. It is time for you to demonstrate the superb leadership qualities that you have exercised in the last five years. I ask you to carefully consider all those members of the National executive and others who have a loyally served you and the MDC since September 1999. I ask you to consider what those people have actually done not what others say they desire.

I find it ironic that at the very time we have ZANU PF on its knees and seriously divided, we ourselves appear to be intent on tearing up everything we have worked so hard to build up over the last few very difficult years. I urge you to realise that at this moment when victory is within our grasp you are still supported by an overwhelming majority. That support will only be undermined if you fail to act in a determined and bold fashion to root out those responsible for the despicable actions that have bedeviled the MDC in the last few months.

David Coltart

Secretary for Legal Affairs
Bulawayo
14th July 2005.

Posted in Statements | Leave a comment

New Zealand earn plaudits for taking stand against corrupt Zimbabwe

The Daily Telegraph
11th July 2005
By Kate Hoey

In Bulawayo, just a short walk from the Matatabeleland cricket ground I watched as security police forced the poor to knock down their own homes. Further north and within a few yards of the the Mashonaland Cricket Association’s home ground, Harare Sports Club, I saw families gathering together their few possessions remaining from the attack on their homes.

18 months earlier, on a similar undercover visit, I had met some of the young Zimbabweans who had been arrested during the Cricket World Cup match in Bulawayo and later tortured. Yet despite protests the England cricket team’s tour to Zimbabwe went ahead – the ECB refusing to let ‘politics’ interfere with their income.

I did see the one positive outcome of that tour, however. ‘A.G.’ Ndlovu, Deputy Mayor of Bulawayo and a member of the MDC, Zimbabwe’s opposition party, took me to Nketa Emganwini, one of the poorer districts in Bulawayo, to see the newly completed cricket nets donated by Richard Bevan of the Professional Cricketers Association. The £1500 donation was a positive way to nurture cricketers deprived of opportunity simply because they live in opposition areas. Inspecting the nets, I saw excited local children waiting in anticipation to use them. Just a few hours later swathes of the surrounding suburbs were demolished. So far the nets have escaped Mugabe’s axe of destruction.

How can cricket be played in such circumstances? Zimbabwe’s cricket has been in crisis for several years. When some of the World Cup matches were held in Zimbabwe, Andy Flower and Henry Olonga wore black armbands to “mourn the death of democracy” in their country.

Since then many who worked for the Zimbabwe Cricket Union (ZCU) have been sacked or have had conditions made so unpleasant for them that they have voluntarily resigned. John Ward,who was their ‘media consultant’,a job which combined match reporter, statistician, biographer, historian, compiler of the yearbook and main contributor to the web site is a good example of what is happening inside this Zanu PF controlled organisation.

In March he took his ZCU laptop for repair. Ozias Bvute, Managing Director of the ZCU ordered the technician to examine the hard drive. Bvute suspected Ward of being the ‘Steven Price’ who had written anti-ZCU articles in Wisden. No articles were found but Ward had corresponded regularly with people all over the world and the technician came up with those e mails and personal correspondence that contained criticism of ZCU policy. Bvute immediately sacked him.

Few are left in the ZCU with any significant cricketing background. Those who really care about cricket have been marginalised. John Ward now believes there are no grounds for maintaining normal sporting relations with the ZCU. Even those who had clung to the hope that this was the right thing to do now believe that such links only help Zanu PF’s propaganda. David Coltart the opposition MP for Bulawayo South, himself a big cricket fan told me that it would be obscene to play cricket whilst millions suffer so much.

At last a Government seems to be standing up to Mugabe. Our Government must follow New Zealand’s lead. It really is time to stop all sporting links with Zimbabwe.FULL marks to the New Zealand government for keeping up the pressure on the International Cricket Council over sporting links with Zimbabwe. If my recent undercover trip to Robert Mugabe’s benighted country taught me anything it was how ruthlessly his police state operates. It is impossible to imagine cricket being played amid scenes of devastation where the poorest people’s homes are being demolished.

Last week New Zealand’s Foreign Minister, Phil Goff, wrote to the ICC requesting that Zimbabwe be excluded from international tours. He urged that concern over human rights abuse by Mugabe should allow the New Zealand cricket squad to cancel their scheduled trip to Zimbabwe this summer without suffering a fine of as much as £1 million.

In his letter, Goff wrote: “We believe that the International Cricket Council cannot ignore these gross abuses as if they were not happening when scheduling the Futures Tours Programme.

“We therefore request the ICC, as a matter of urgency, to consider revising the Programme to exclude tours to Zimbabwe and by Zimbabwe while this situation continues in that country.”

Prime Minister Helen Clark had already gone much further than other world leaders in imposing sanctions on Zimbabwean politicians and business leaders and stopping them entering New Zealand. The Zimbabwean team will not be granted visas to tour in December. But the request to the ICC to exclude Zimbabwe from all international cricket is a welcome direct intervention from a government.

During my visit to Zimbabwe I saw for myself the devastating effects of the crackdown on the informal economy and the shanty towns. The film I smuggled out showed the rubble of thousands of demolished homes and businesses destroyed by Mugabe’s security police with the homeless sleeping in the open. New Zealand television carried the pictures and those campaigning for the cricket tour to be cancelled are more confident of success.

To get over the border into Zimbabwe I reverted to my days as a PE teacher, carrying a huge bag of footballs as a camouflage to visit sports clubs. In fact, the footballs were in great demand and I could easily have distributed a container load – as well as many other items such as shin pads that are an unimaginable luxury even for football teams in Zimbabwe’s Premier League.

In Bulawayo, a short walk from the Matabeleland cricket ground, I watched as security police forced the poor to knock down their own homes. Further north and within a few yards of the Mashonaland Cricket Association’s home ground, Harare Sports Club, I saw families gathering together the few possessions remaining after an attack on their homes.

Eighteen months earlier, on a similar undercover visit, I had met some of the young Zimbabweans who had been arrested during the World Cup match in Bulawayo and later tortured. Yet despite protests, the England cricket team’s tour to Zimbabwe went ahead – the ECB refusing to let “politics” interfere with their income.

I did see the one positive outcome of that tour. A G Ndlovu, the Deputy Mayor of Bulawayo and a member of the MDC, Zimbabwe’s opposition party, took me to Nketa Emganwini, one of the poorer districts in Bulawayo, to see the newly-completed cricket nets donated by Richard Bevan of the Professional Cricketers’ Association. The £1,500 donation was a positive way to nurture cricketers deprived of opportunity simply because they live in opposition areas. Inspecting the nets, I saw excited children waiting in anticipation to use them. Just a few hours later swathes of the surrounding suburbs were demolished. So far, the nets have escaped Mugabe’s axe of destruction.

How can cricket be played in such circumstances? The game in Zimbabwe has been in crisis for years. When World Cup matches were held in Zimbabwe, Andy Flower and Henry Olonga wore black armbands to “mourn the death of democracy” in their country.
Since then many who worked for the Zimbabwe Cricket Union (ZCU) have been sacked or have had conditions made so unpleasant for them that they have resigned. John Ward, who was their ‘media consultant’, a job which combined the roles of match reporter, statistician, biographer, historian, compiler of the yearbook and main contributor to the website, is a good example of what is happening inside this Zanu PF-controlled organisation.

In March he took his ZCU laptop for repair. Ozias Bvute, the managing director of the ZCU, ordered the technician to examine the hard drive. Bvute suspected Ward of being the “Steven Price” who had written anti-ZCU articles in Wisden. No articles were found but Ward had corresponded regularly with people all over the world and the technician came up with those e-mails and personal correspondence that contained criticism of ZCU policy. Bvute immediately sacked him.

Few are left in the ZCU with any significant cricketing background. Those who really care about cricket have been marginalised. Ward believes there are no grounds for maintaining normal sporting relations with the ZCU. Even those who had clung to the hope that this was the right thing to do now believe that such links only help Zanu PF’s propaganda. David Coltart, the opposition MP for Bulawayo South – a big cricket fan – told me that it would be obscene to play while millions suffer so much.

At last, a government seem to be standing up to Mugabe. Our Government must follow New Zealand’s lead. It really is time to stop all sporting links with Zimbabwe.

Posted in Press reports | Leave a comment

Homeless and hopeless: bulldozers carve out a bleak new reality for poor Zimbabweans

The Guardian

In a special report from Harare, Duncan Campbell witnesses Mugabe’s drive to clear the makeshift homes of hundreds of thousands of people

The giant prehistoric Balancing Rocks that stand 10 miles from the centre of Harare are one of the great symbols of Zimbabwe, etched on to banknotes and pictured in every tourist guide. Immediately across the road from the rocks is a new symbol of the nation, one that is unlikely to feature in any guidebook or on the notes of the collapsing Zimbabwean dollar.

It consists of piles of rubble, corrugated iron and random belongings – a basin, a single shoe, a coathanger – like the detritus left in the wake of an earthquake or a storm. This was home to hundreds of people in the suburb of Epworth until President Robert Mugabe announced last month that Operation Murambatsvina (Clear Out the Trash) was under way. He authorised the destruction of the homes of hundreds of thousands of people across the country as a way of removing what the police commissioner, Augustine Chihuri, described as “this crawling mass of maggots” who had settled into makeshift townships on the fringes of cities. So far at least seven people have died in the clear-out, there have been six suicides reported and 22,000 people have been arrested or had their property confiscated.

“They stood there with their AKs [Kalashnikov rifles] and told us we must knock our own homes down,” said George, a bearded, middle-aged man who told his story as though recounting something utterly unfathomable. “Last night, we all slept on the ground under a blanket with plastic bags over us. This is what the government is doing to its people.”

The drive back into town has a surreal quality to it. On one side of the road, a group of Apostolic worshippers dressed in immaculate white are conducting an open-air service as tsiri-tsiri birds hop beside them in the fields. On the other side, hundreds of people desperate to get into Harare to work or buy food try to flag down overloaded cars and lorries.

“We have to start walking at four in the morning now to get to work,” said Joyce, a young woman from Hatfield, another affected area. Most will end up walking the 10 miles as petrol has almost run out, and drivers queue for up to seven days, sleeping in their cars as they wait for the pumps to open. “Some of the petrol stations, they ask to see your Zanu-PF [Mr Mugabe’s ruling party] card before they serve you,” George said. In the centre of the highway, armed police man roadblocks, waving down and searching cars.

“This country is upside down now,” said one young man. “Once we had beef and tobacco and maize and now – look – we have to stand in line for petrol, for money, for mealie meal, for sugar. Soon there will be no country left at all.”

A retired carpenter in his 80s said he had never seen Zimbabwe in such a state. “You have to be careful what you say in public,” he said. “You don’t know who is listening and what may happen to you but even under the whites there was always work if you wanted it.”

State of emergency

Operation Murambatsvina was launched in the wake of Mr Mugabe’s fiercely contested election victory earlier this year, which established him in power, with 108 of the 150 parliamentary seats, until 2008, at which stage he has indicated he will step down after 25 years as president. It also comes as he has increased from two years to 20 the penalty for “publishing and communicating false statements prejudicial to the state”. But the law has not curbed his critics.

“Once he was our darling,” said Marcus, a young businessman in Harare. “I remember when we were at school, we would all clap when we saw him on television and he did great things with education, with healthcare. But now the old man is ruining the country. He says that he will go in 2008, but even if he does, that will be too late. He needs to go tomorrow. He cannot go on treating people like this.

“He is not Pol Pot and he is not Hitler, like some of his enemies say, but he has been behaving brutally. It has never been this bad before. What you have here is a de facto state of emergency.”

Not only Harare has been affected. From the Victoria Falls to Bulawayo to Beitbridge, the bulldozers have gone in. Over the past week a transit camp has been opened at Caledonia Farm near the capital to house some of the homeless in single-sex units, but many now sleep in the open or erect shelters secretly at night and pull them down before dawn. No one knows exactly how many have lost their homes. The government figure is 120,000 while opposition groups have claimed as many as a million. Aid agencies suggest the total is around 300,000.

The government remains bullish. Didymus Mutasa, minister for state security and head of the Central Intelligence Organisation, said on Zimbabwe state radio: “Everyone in Zimbabwe is very happy about this clean-up. People are walking around Harare saying ‘we never knew we had such a beautiful city’.”

Yesterday, the UN special envoy, Anna Kajumulo Tibaijuka, continued an inspection that started last week at the behest of the secretary general, Kofi Annan. According to the government newspaper the Herald, she applauded Mr Mugabe’s “vision”, but the report was immediately dismissed by a UN spokesman as inaccurate.

Why has Mr Mugabe launched such an operation which has brought him the attention of the UN and condemnation around the world at a time when he is already beleaguered? The government’s justification is threefold: that the settlements consist of illegal structures which create a health hazard and damage Harare’s fragile infrastructure; that they breed crime; and that the “parallel market” of unauthorised businesses dealing in currency, goods and fuel constitute a serious threat to the country’s economy.

Inflation is at 144% and unemployment is nearing 80%. While the official exchange rate is around ZW$9,000 to the US dollar, the black market rate on the street corner in Harare outside Meikles Hotel is ZW$25,000. Lack of foreign currency after the collapse of the tourist industry has caused the latest fuel shortage. The other shortages Mr Mugabe blames on droughts and what he portrays as a racist campaign waged against him by Tony Blair and George Bush.

Mr Mugabe’s opponents see his motives very differently: to punish those from the settlements who voted so heavily against him and for the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) in the elections, and to disperse people who might foment an uprising in an increasingly hostile political environment.

“Another reason he is doing this is because farming has collapsed since he took the farms away from the white farmers and gave them to the war veterans [who fought the white regime] – although many people think he just gave them to his supporters,” said a young technician in Harare. “The people who had worked on the farms came to the cities because there was no work for them in the country. Now Mugabe wants to drive them back because the farms are producing nothing.”

On the streets of Harare, people ask how much a flight to London costs, what an average wage is there, what work is available. An estimated 3 million Zimbabweans now live abroad, mainly in South Africa but also in Britain – as evidenced by the current hunger strike by asylum seekers – and the money they send back keeps the economy afloat.

Politically, the clean-up has already prompted fissures within the ruling party. Two days ago a Zanu-PF central committee member, Pearson Mbalekwa, resigned, declaring himself “perturbed and disturbed” by what he saw. He is seen as testing the water for others to follow and there is talk of a “third force”, a grouping of disillusioned Zanu-PF members and some MDC politicians.

The MDC’s shadow justice minister, David Coltart, said yesterday that he thought that unlikely. “I think it’s a distinct possibility that Zanu will fragment,” he told the Guardian. “I think an uprising is unlikely and the country will just literally grind to a halt. Sadly, when you go to some other African states, you will see that Zimbabwe has quite a way to go.”

Mr Mugabe remains unbowed. In an interview with the magazine New African he denounced Tony Blair, saying he “wants to continue to maintain this headmaster type of attitude – you must submit, after all you are a black nigger”.

The new minister for information, Tichaona Jokonya, defended the laws governing the media and the prohibitions on foreign media operating in the country. He said the BBC, which is banned in Zimbabwe, had wanted 36 people accredited for the elections. “Obviously, we knew what they were up to,” he told New African. “They wanted journalists to come here with a pack of intelligence guys.”

The Guardian’s former Zimbabwe correspondent, Andrew Meldrum, was deported two years ago, and in May two Sunday Telegraph journalists were jailed for two weeks after being detained for reporting without permission. This report was compiled on the same basis and names of members of the public interviewed have been duly changed.

Mandela invited

The one country in the region with the power to influence events is South Africa, but its president, Thabo Mbeki, has reiterated the position of the African Union: Zimbabwe is a sovereign country and what it does within its borders is its own affair. Mr Mbeki has also echoed Mr Mugabe’s view that the west is only concerned about Zimbabwe because of its old colonial interests. This week, however, Mr Mbeki has held talks for the first time with the MDC leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, who yesterday called on G8 leaders to intervene in Zimbabwe.

The only other South African with the personal and moral power to intervene is Nelson Mandela, and pressure is already being put on him by Zimbabweans to act. Mr Mandela has been invited as guest of honour at a party to celebrate the Mugabes’ 10th wedding anniversary. In an open letter from “concerned Zimbabweans” in the opposition newspaper the Zimbabwean, an appeal has been made to Mr Mandela to stay away. “We, your admirers, are concerned that your attendance at this event will be construed as a blessing of the things that are occurring in Zimbabwe,” urges the anonymous letter writer. “I do not think that you are able to eat and drink and make merry while Africans are being oppressed.”

Mr Coltart, the shadow justice minister, believes South Africa now has to engage in meaningful efforts to broker a way out of the crisis. “When Zanu realises that they have to jettison Mugabe, then maybe something will happen, but the outlook is pretty gloomy.”

The International Crisis Group, the Brussels-based body chaired by Lord Patten, said in its report on the elections last month that “economic meltdown, food insecurity, political repression and tensions over land and ethnicity are all ongoing facts of life that the election has not changed for the better in any way”. It concluded: “Robert Mugabe has been the father of Zimbabwe in many respects but he is now the single greatest impediment to pulling the country out of its precipitous social, economic and political decline.”

Out in Epworth, there is a plume of smoke from burning tyres. The Balancing Rocks of Chipenga may have survived for thousands of years, but modern Zimbabwe’s balancing act seems more precarious by the day.

Posted in Press reports | Leave a comment

Mugabe attacks Blair and turns back on ‘useless’ Commonwealth

Scotland on Sunday

ROBERT Mugabe has ruled out ever trying to get back into the “useless” Commonwealth during a blistering attack on Tony Blair and his “gay gangsters”.
In his first interview for more than a year, Mugabe also insisted he had discussed the issue at length during a meeting with Prince Charles, where he expressed his admiration and respect for the Royal Family.

The 81-year-old did, however, say he would open his doors to Foreign Office diplomats in a bid to restore relations between Zimbabwe and Britain.
Mugabe has been ostracised by the international community after a million of his own people were made homeless in a campaign to punish opposition supporters for voting against his ruling party Zanu (PF).

The Zimbabwean president said in Harare: “If Tony Blair wants to open his doors and he wants us to open our doors, fine. His people can come here. My people can go to London and mend our relations.”

But he dismissed speculation that members of the Commonwealth Secretariat would be able to persuade him to try to rejoin the 53-nations ‘club’ that takes in roughly a third of the world’s population.

He described the Commonwealth as “a useless body which has treated Zimbabwe in a dishonourable manner”. Mugabe told the London-based magazine New African that he wants his rejection of the Commonwealth written in the hearts of the people of Zimbabwe.

“We will establish relations with individual members of the Commonwealth; there is nothing wrong with that. And even if we get a Britain which is not run in the same way in regard to our relations as the Britain of Tony Blair – fine.
“We will mend our relations, and this is what I told Prince Charles when we met in Rome recently at the Pope’s funeral.”

It is the first reference Mugabe has made to his handshake with the heir to the British throne on April 8.

A Clarence House official said: “The Prince of Wales was caught by surprise and not in a position to avoid shaking Mr Mugabe’s hand.” But according to Mugabe, the two men had a long chat and recalled the night of April 17, 1980, when the Prince attended Zimbabwe’s independence celebrations.

“We discussed relations and we said we have tremendous respect for the Queen. Every member of the Royal Family has been to Zimbabwe and we have tremendous respect for every member of that family.

“We have souvenirs of their visits here. We respect them and we continue to respect them.” But that “respect” excludes Tony Blair, whom Mugabe says is surrounded by people he refers to as “Blair’s gay gangsters”.

A source close to the ruling Zanu (PF) party, who asked not to be named, said: “It’s a typical Mugabe ploy. He is appealing to the British people over the head of Tony Blair.

“Mugabe is clever. He uses the same tactic with the South Africans and threatens Thabo Mbeki whenever he can. He says to African leaders that Mbeki – who is George Bush’s point man in Africa – wants Mugabe to go slow on land reform because he [Mbeki] is a puppet of the white man.”

Last week Scotland on Sunday revealed that low-level talks between Zimbabwean and British officials had already opened in Harare on the subject of repairing long-damaged relations before the start of the G8 meeting at Gleneagles.

Mbeki and his Tanzanian counterpart, Benjamin Mkapa, are expected to tell Britain and other G8 countries to seek a fast agreement with Zimbabwe in order to stave off hunger and chaos in a key southern African country.

They would like to see Mugabe retire and live comfortably with his young wife Grace and their three children at a £7m palace in the once all-white suburb of Borrowdale in Harare.

The understanding would be that Britain and the Commonwealth Secretariat would then deal with the next Zimbabwean leader Joyce Mujuru, the vice president, who is married to one of Zimbabwe’s richest men, Solomon Mujuru.

He was the commander of Mugabe’s military machine during the war against white-ruled Rhodesia between 1972 and 1979.

Meanwhile, diplomats in Harare were stunned to hear that Anna Kajumulo Tibaijuka, executive director of the Nairobi-based UN-Habitat and a close friend of Tanzania’s president Ben Mkapa, who supports Mugabe, had told the People’s Daily in China that by demolishing thousands of shantytown homes, Mugabe had declared war “not on poor people but on poverty”.

She was in Harare to study the scope of the recent eviction of “illegal squatters and dwellers” who, say Zimbabwean insiders, supported the opposition Movement for Democratic Change at the election in March. Television pictures showed her being handed a starving baby at Porta Farm in Zimbabwe.

“The baby is starving,” she exclaimed, handing it back immediately. “Give it food.” But a voice off screen said – “There is no food.”

The legal affairs spokesman for the MDC, David Coltart, told Scotland on Sunday that he expected Mugabe to start demolishing the homes of anyone who opposes him. “I have no doubt that if the Mugabe regime can think of a pretext that it can sell to Africa, it will do anything to undermine the opposition,” he said.

“That could easily include raiding homes of opposition figures. I suspect that they will allege that leaders are individually guilty of some serious offence and use that to justify further harassment.”

He added: “Mugabe said that his intention was to bury the opposition, and he and his cronies will undoubtedly do everything possible to destroy the opposition.”

Posted in Press reports | Leave a comment

The MDC’s decision to attend Parliament

There has been considerable controversy surrounding the MDC’s decision to have its 41 elected members of Parliament sworn in and participate in Parliament. A variety of criticisms have been made but most focus on arguments that the decision is a betrayal of those losing MDC candidates who had their seats stolen from them by ZANU (PF) and that the presence of MDC MPs in Parliament legitimises the entire election, ZANU (PF)’s rule and the new Parliament itself.

At the outset let me state that most of us in the MDC understood that the elections would be rigged and that there was very little prospect of us winning. Indeed when we announced our decision to participate we said we would do so under protest and that was because we understood that the playing field was warped and that ZANU (PF) would use every trick in the book to deny the people of Zimbabwe the right to choose candidates of their choice. Whilst some in the MDC were carried away by the huge crowds who attended our rallies, especially in the last two weeks of the campaign, many of us continued to say both privately and publicly in campaign rallies (and to the media) that the elections would be rigged.

In the Sunday Telegraph of the 20th of March 2005 I was quoted extensively in an article entitled “Zimbabwe election has no chance of being fair”. Part of the article reads: “he also suspected that ZANU PF would simply announce the results in its favour, regardless of the votes cast… they have all the machinery in place to rig it… the big question isn’t if they will do it, but how they will do it”. I and others in the MDC were under no illusions. If you ask anyone who attended any of my rallies they will tell you that I had repeatedly said that Mugabe would not allow us to win and that the election should be seen as part of a process not an event.

In the same campaign rallies I argued why it was necessary that we contest the elections. I said that we had no option as a social democratic party committed to non-violent principles, as any refusal to participate would mean that we had given up hope of ever achieving change through peaceful, democratic means. I said that we had consulted widely and that most importantly the people of Zimbabwe wanted us to participate. I said that there was no chance of our participation legitimising the regime as those who already supported the regime would continue to support whether we participated or not, and that those who abhorred the regime would continue to do so. I said that with a great reduction in democratic space it was vital that we held whatever ground we had to expose the regime. I pointed out that they were very few historical precedents in Africa in which boycotting parties effected change, but that there were many positive precedents in countries such as Senegal, Ghana and Kenya where parties which continued to participate in patently flawed elections ultimately prevailed. I pointed out that it was only if we participated that we would be able to expose both the electoral fraud and ZANU PF’s deep divisions.

I believe that our decision to participate has been vindicated. In particular I have no doubt that had we not participated ZANU PF would not only have conducted a seemingly non-violent campaign but, more seriously, the rampant and serious fraud would not have been exposed. We should not fool ourselves about South Africa’s position, for example. I have absolutely no doubt that if we had not participated South Africa would have blamed us and would have said that we should not be heard to complain as we had ourselves chosen not to be in the game. Had we not participated, the debacle which occurred with the announcement of the total votes cast on Thursday evening would not have happened. Had we not participated, we would never have been in a position to document and expose the systematic and widespread breaches of the Electoral Act.

In essence what I’m arguing is that there were many sober heads in the MDC who understood that not only did we have no choice but to participate, but that our very participation would serve to further undermine any claims to legitimacy the regime may have had. We understood that ZANU PF would rig the election and barring a massive turnout of voters there was always a possibility that the MDC would lose some of the seats it already held. Of course our efforts were not helped by some in civil society who urged a boycott or the spoiling of ballots. Be that as it may the fact remains that despite the attempts of SADC to endorse the poll the regime has not been legitimised and in fact is in worse trouble than ever. The Americans, the European Union and many others condemned the election and have imposed even tougher measures against the regime. Even the African Union was not prepared to give an unequivocal endorsement. The regime shot itself in the foot in that most of its “good” work (in ensuring a violence-free run-up to the poll) was messed up by Thursday night’s announcement and being forced as a result to add 244,000 extra votes to the final figures.

Having decided to participate in an election we knew would be stolen it would now be illogical not to take up our seats. As I have stated above one of the reasons for participating in a fraudulent poll was so that we would maintain as much democratic space as possible. In a country where every independent daily newspaper has been shut down and where the only shortwave broadcasting radio has been jammed there is very little democratic space. We all have very few opportunities to expose what this regime is doing and the folly of its policies. Whilst Parliament certainly has its limitations the fact remains that it is a forum where these issues can be spoken of openly and where a daily record is taken of what has been said and, more importantly, what has been exposed.

One of the tragedies of the last Parliament is that the independent media failed to report on what was exposed during Parliamentary sessions. My own committee of inquiry is a case in point. When that committee was established there is no doubt that the regime’s intention was to commit me to prison in the same way Roy Bennett has been committed to prison. However that committee of inquiry was turned on its head when detailed evidence was presented to the committee regarding corruption in the allocation of farms. Indeed those committee hearings played a major role in driving a wedge between Jonathan Moyo and the rest of ZANU (PF). The report that Renson Gasela initiated in September regarding the food situation is another case in point. And there are many more examples of how Parliament was used to make this regime accountable. Indeed it was our participation in the last Parliament that finally exposed ZANU (PF) for what it really is to the world.

In my view it is absolutely vital that we continue that exercise; that we continue to use Parliament to expose the true nature of this regime. In the context of the current Operation Murambatsvina it is vital that we be in Parliament to document in a public record the horrendous human rights abuses which have been perpetrated by this regime.

Of course there is no doubt that because the regime enjoys such an overwhelming majority it will now be able to ride roughshod over us. However this regime remains desperate to restore its legitimate status and to that extent has to be careful about how far it goes in abusing Parliamentary practice. Whilst it may be able to vote us down on every single piece of legislation presented to Parliament it will still have to respect basic Parliamentary procedure which means that we will have an opportunity to record the truth behind every lie used by the regime to justify Draconian legislation.

In closing I should mention that regarding my own Bulawayo South constituency I have canvassed the views of my constituents in several public and private meetings. In one case a questionnaire was produced giving constituents the opportunity to vote for me either to attend Parliament without protest, or not to attend Parliament or, finally, to attend Parliament in such a way that does not confer legitimacy on the regime and in a way that ensures the Parliamentary process is used to protect Zimbabweans’ rights and democratic space. In the poll that was conducted an overwhelming majority wanted me to adopt the third option. In my constituency it is clear that my constituents do not want me simply to warm a seat in Parliament. An overwhelming majority do want me in Parliament but in there fighting for their rights at every turn. I cannot say that this is the case in every constituency but I have no doubt in my constituency that I have a very clear and dominant mandate to participate but under certain conditions.

One further point: I do not see participation in Parliament as the be all and end all of the struggle to bring about democracy. I see it as one method and indeed not the main method of doing so. It should be seen as a method that is complementary to other forms of non-violent struggle. And just as I do not criticize those in civil society who engage in other forms of non-violent struggle, and indeed do all in my power to help them, so I believe that our participation should be seen as an asset that can be used to assist these other forms of struggle.

In the current fragile state this nation finds itself in no one has a monopoly of knowledge as to what is the correct policy to adopt. I understand and respect the views of those who fear that our participation in Parliament, despite the arguments I’ve raised above, will nevertheless legitimise this awful regime. I am deeply conscious of this and will constantly review my own position in Parliament and will continue to discuss my continued participation with my constituents and friends and colleagues who I respect. I hope that those who are critical of my decision will at least grant me the acknowledgement that I am acting in good faith and that I am trying to do what I can to share in the new dawn of democracy, something Zimbabwe so desperately needs.

David Coltart MP – Bulawayo South

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Mugabe wages war on poor and jobless

Sunday Independent (SA)

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

In the course of this week, thousands of poor Zimbabweans living in Harare, Bulawayo and other urban centres have had their lives destroyed by an increasingly vicious, brutal and paranoid regime.

On the pretext of a “clean-up”, the regime’s police and army have systematically gone through our cities and towns arresting street vendors, confiscating their goods and destroying the homes of poor people.

While there is no doubt that some of these roadside shops and shacks are an eyesore and unhygienic, and while there is no doubt that virtually all are strictly speaking “illegal”, they have to be seen in the context of the fastest shrinking economy in the world, which in turn is characterised by 80 percent unemployment and rampant inflation.

The state of the economy is a direct result of the insane policies implemented by the Mugabe regime since 1997, when it first decided to send troops to protect its leaders’ interests in the Congo.

The chaotic land invasions orchestrated by the regime from 2000 to secure its grip on power have dealt a near death blow to the economy. The regime’s excessive spending on protecting itself and maintaining the elite’s luxurious lifestyle has resulted in greatly reduced spending on health, housing and education.

The vast majority of the people affected by this callous campaign are victims of these policies. Through no fault of their own they have been driven out of the formal sector and, in order to survive, have had to try to earn an honest living by street vending.

Because the regime has spent billions on a huge military and a bloated, inefficient and corrupt cabinet, rather than on housing, hundreds of thousands have been forced to build shacks so that they have a roof above their heads.

I have no doubt that this pogrom will dramatically increase the number of deaths of poor Zimbabweans afflicted by the deadly combination of Aids, no access to drugs and malnutrition. The sudden removal of a source of income and a warm bed will condemn many to death in the coming weeks and months.

The truth is that it is Mugabe’s regime that is primarily responsible for massive corruption, which is not only some of the worst type of criminal activity but has also destroyed the economy and forced these poor Zimbabweans into penury.

The truth is also that this exercise has very little to do with a genuine desire to improve the lives of Zimbabweans. It has everything to do with a campaign of retribution against people who are, correctly, perceived to oppose the regime. It has everything to do with their fear that these same people will rise up in revolt against a regime that has been responsible for the destruction of the lives, hopes and dreams of millions of Zimbabweans. It has everything to do with instilling fear in the hearts of these people before they rise up.

We, for our part, will do everything possible to protect those affected by the depredations of this regime. We will do all in our power to expose the extent of the devastation, to use the courts to suspend these immoral actions and to mobilise communities to oppose the regime lawfully, peacefully and non-violently.

Now is the time for the international community to intensify pressure on this regime to respect basic human rights, to restore the rule of law in a just and humane manner and to respect the democratic will of the electorate through the holding of free and fair elections that comply with international electoral standards.

David Coltart MP
Shadow Justice Minister
Zimbabwe

Posted in Articles, Letters | Leave a comment

Harassment of Coltart catalogued

The Zimbabwean

Here we continue with the REDRESS report on human rights abuses experienced by opposition MPs and election candidates. This is what happened to David Coltart, Bulawayo South MP, and MDC Shadow Minister and Secretary for Legal Affairs. Harassment of Coltart began early on. In May 2000 when he attempted to register his candidacy for the Movement for Democratic Change, the Registrar General tried to bar his nomination, forcing Coltart to prove he was a Zimbabwean and not a British citizen.

In June 2000, about a week before the election, Coltart was warned that his home would be burned. At the same time, 10 of his polling agents were detained illegally for 24 hours by self-styled war veterans, lectured and threatened.

One agent, Patrick Nabanyama, was abducted on June 19 in the presence of his wife and children. He has never been seen again and is feared dead. Eight war veterans were subsequently arrested, but later pardoned under the October 2000 amnesty. They faced trial for murder but with no body, they were found not guilty.

In August 2000, after Coltart filed legal papers in the trial of MDC president Morgan Tsvangirai, Robert Mugabe declared on television there was no place for him in Zimbabwe.

Some 14 armed police and CIO agents raided Coltart’s home on October 4 that year, threatening his sons, aged 8 and 10, who were alone. Coltart’s wife returned and managed to keep the police and CIO outside until her husband arrived. The officers then produced an illegally obtained warrant to search for ‘broadcasting equipment, aircraft, boats and safes’. They found nothing.

On November 5, 2001 Cain Nkala, the Chairman of the War Veterans Association, was abducted. When Coltart returned from a visit to New York a week later, police publicly accused Coltart and threatened retribution.

Days later, on November 12, Coltart’s close friend and former campaign manager, Simon Spooner, was arrested and accused of being involved with Nkala’s disappearance. He was held in solitary confinement for five weeks in deplorable conditions. Eventually, prosecutors dropped the charges.

Then, on November 15, the private light aircraft in which Coltart was returning to Bulawayo from a parliamentary session was ordered by the CIO to turn back. As it landed in Harare, three truckloads of police and CIO agents surrounded the plane, told Coltart he was under investigation – refusing to say what for – and held him for two hours.

Heading back to Bulawayo by car, he received a tip off that hundreds of police, armed with petrol, were on their way to his home. He telephoned his wife who gathered up their children and fled.

During Cain Nkala’s burial three days later, Robert Mugabe in a nationally televised address referred to Coltart and other MDC members as ‘terrorists’.

And so it continued the following year. On the afternoon of February 16, 2002, when Coltart and his family set out to collect their eldest daughter from a friend’s birthday party, he saw some 60 members of the feared Youth Brigade roaming the neighbourhood.

The family took an alternate route to pick up the child, and returned to find 100 youths barricading both roads leading to their home. Coltart turned around and reported this to this to police – something he later regretted.

That evening, a truckload of police turned up saying they were responding to a report, and then left. Soon afterward, at 8:15 p.m., three truckloads of armed police and CIO agents returned. This time, they were menacing and claimed Coltart had shot a youth. Coltart denied the allegation and refused to let them search his house without a warrant. The officers left, threatening to return to ‘get’ him. The family fled into hiding.

The following Monday, Coltart – who does not own a gun – reported to the police and was charged with discharging a firearm. As a public humiliation, police drove him in the back of an open truck through the centre of Bulawayo and through his constituency while other officers raided his house – and found nothing.

For more than a year the case dragged on with numerous court appearances until prosecutors withdrew the charge in June 2003 after a magistrate ordered the trial to proceed forthwith.

In April 2002, the MDC received credible information of a plan to assassinate Coltart. Four months later, Robert Mugabe in a television broadcast said, “the likes of the Bennetts and Coltarts don’t belong here and if they choose to remain they can remain in prison”. And the harassment grew.

In November that year, his car’s brake linings were cut, and on March 3, 2003, a rear tyre was sabotaged. On the morning of March 15, the weekend before the MDC mass stay away, Coltart noticed a vehicle with three men and what appeared to be a weapon inside as he left home with his 9-year-old son and 18-month-old daughter to drive to a children’s sports day. With the car following him at speed, Coltart’s security team intercepted, and the trailing car gave up and left. Coltart went into hiding for two weeks.

March 2005: Despite widespread poll-rigging and intimidation, Coltart wins a resounding re-election victory.

Posted in Biographical | 5 Comments