Research Fellow Jessica Brown discusses religious influence in politics with Zimbabwean politician, human rights lawyer, and pro-democracy activist, David Coltart.
Research Fellow Jessica Brown discusses religious influence in politics with Zimbabwean politician, human rights lawyer, and pro-democracy activist, David Coltart.
NewsDay
By Ronald Moyo
17 December 2011
The Matabeleland Aids Council (MAC) surveys have revealed students in tertiary and secondary levels of education were in support of the idea of condom distribution in both high schools and tertiary institutions, an official has said.
Speaking at a MAC strategic review programme, the council’s community capacity building manager, Musa Sibindi, said youths across the Matabeleland region had “demanded†condoms in their schools on the grounds that they were already sexually active and wanted to be safe.
“Our surveys found out that young people in tertiary and secondary levels of education wanted condoms to be distributed in schools as they admitted they were sexually active,†she said.
“This is something that the National Aids Council had suggested to the Ministry of Education, Sports, Arts and Culture to approve and the matter is still being debated at higher levels.â€
Sibindi said the majority of new HIV infections occur among the 20 to 29-year age group.
“According to estimates last taken in 2009, Zimbabwe has an HIV prevalence rate of 14-26% amongst the adult population with 80% of the infections spread through heterosexual sex,†she said.
“The figure is, however, currently increasing amongst young people as the latest figures reveal that the 20 to 29-year-old age group has the highest rates of new infections.â€
Following discussions at the strategic review programme, MAC members and stakeholders suggested that condom distribution in schools would reduce the spread of HIV infections in the 20 to 29-year-old age group.
But Education, Sport, Arts and Culture minister David Coltart ruled out the distribution of condoms in schools saying this would promote promiscuity.
“The Ministry of Education, Sport, Arts and Culture will not adopt such a policy and it was not in our plans to do so,†he said at a World Aids Day event in Bulawayo early this month.
“Condom distribution in schools will promote promiscuity.
“They should not be in schools because this would imply that we want them to have sex when in fact most parents will promote abstinence and this should be the thrust of our education.â€
Coltart said Aids awareness classes must be preferred to condom distribution as this would educate students about sexual health instead of encouraging them to partake in sexual activity.
Sunday Mail
10 December 2011Â
The Government has denied reports it intends to dismiss the over 1 000 teachers who were given a reprieve after migrating to greener pastures.
This comes after teacher representatives indicated Government was moving to fire the teachers who had sought employment in neighbouring countries since 2000.
The Government employees migrated alongside other professionals at the height of Zimbabwe’s economic downturn. The multi-currency system introduced in 2009 stabilised the economy and, thereafter, saw them trooping back home.
In an interview last week, Public Service Deputy Minister Cde Andrew Langa said the country still faces a shortage of teachers and needs to recruit more to fill vacant posts, especially in rural schools.
“We are not aware of such developments (to fire the rehired teachers). What I can tell you is that the country has a critical shortage of qualified teachers. Government needs to recruit more staff to fill the gaps,†he said. Education, Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Senator David Coltart concurred, saying there was need to train more teachers. However, Zimbabwe Teachers’ Association president Mrs Tendai Chikowore maintained some members received dismissal notices on the grounds that they were re-engaged unprocedurally.
“How can they (the ministers) say there is no such thing when our members have received notices? They should check with their offices to get the true picture.
Progressive Teachers’ Union of Zimbabwe secretary-general Mr Raymond Majongwe confirmed receiving reports that some members got dismissal letters.
He said there was confusion over the issue.
“A lot of teachers are receiving dismissals from their respective district offices. We have been trying to get in touch with the relevant ministers over the issue, but nobody wants to be fingered as the culprit behind this chaos. It is very sad given that these teachers came back after an invitation from Government. The authorities should take this issue seriously,†he said.
At present, Zimbabwe employs about 97 000 teachers against a demand of 111 000.
Southern Africa Report
9 December 2011
The massive bias of departmental budgetary allocations towards ministries controlled by ministers from President Robert Mugabe’s Zanu-PF continues in Zimbabwe’s 2012 budget, passed by Parliament this week (7 December 2011).
The bias makes further conflict within the immobilised three-party government throughout the next 12 months inevitable, further eroding the prospects of achieving the conditions set down by SADC – and agreed by the mutually antagonistic three governing parties – for free and fair elections.
The budgetary distortions undermine the capacity of the service-delivery ministries, predominantly controlled by ministers from Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s MDC. Ironically, they are contained in a budget presented to Parliament by MDC Finance Minister Tendai Biti.
The problem is massively compounded both by the wish-list character of Zimbabwe’s budgetary process and the dominance of Mugabe loyalists in the upper ranks of the civil service. Harare’s Zanu-PF civil service mandarins ensure that Zanu-PF ministries receive significantly higher actual allocations than do ministries controlled by MDC Ministers (see table 2011: Budget – actual payments and 2012 budget highlights).
Nor is it helped by the massive 63% of the budget going to a bloated, and generally under-performing, civil service – for 2012 public sector wages grab 63% of the US$4-billion (R32-billion) budget.
In 2011 Zanu-PF ministries consistently received more than 50% of their non-salary budget allocations. MDC Ministers had to make do with less than half their non-salary allocations – some as low as 22%.
The first of the problems is the continued appetite among Harare’s budgetary planners for heavy security sector, and particularly military, spending. Objectively Zimbabwe faces no regional or international threat – despite Zanu-PF’s attempts to portray former Rhodesians (backed by demonic Western governments) as a clear and present danger. The reality is that those still surviving pose a threat only as far as their Zimmer frames can reach. In 2011, actual defence spending was greater than health and education combined. In 2012, with a 58% in defence’s budget allocation, senior civil servants can be counted on to ensure the gap widens.
The same is true of the Zimbabwe Republic Police, also enjoying a massive budgetary boost. Zanu-PF jealously guards control over the police, which fall under the Department of Home Affairs. MDC Co-Minister Theresa Makone has been physically prevented from playing any role with the police or immigration since her appointment. The commissioner general of police, Zanu-PF hardliner Augustine Chihuri, will not allow her into his office, will not answer her mobile calls, and will not let her make any suggestions at any meetings he attends. She can make no headway with immigration matters either. She can do nothing whatsoever, nor make any contribution to the home affairs ministry.
MDC Deputy Justice Minister Obert Gutu is the only MDC Cabinent Minister to have spoken out on the obstacles placed in his way: writing for a Zimbabwe publication, he says he can play no role in the portfolio, sits at a desk without any documents to peruse, has no duties to perform, and has no possibility of performing any functions in the ministry.
Although the MDC controls Finance, it has been unable to redress this imbalance.
The second – but arguably more pervasive – obstacle is that of the entrenched Zanu-PF civil service mandarins. After opening the way for the “inclusive government” by signing the poorly drafted memorandum of understanding with the MDC in July 2008, Mugabe ensured he kept control of the civil service.
Once he had signed the Global Political Agreement (GPA) two months later, Mugabe immediately began making senior appointments in violation of the GPA, which requires all senior civil service jobs must be filled with Tsvangirai’s “consent”. Mugabe filled every vacancy he could: judges, permanent secretaries, provincial governors, army bosses, diplomats, the lot.
Tsvangirai protested loudly but did little else – hampered initially by antagonism from President Thabo Mbeki’s SADC-endorsed facilitation team, and subsequently by the delays imposed by the Mbeki team failure to provide any handover reports on the complex and byzantine Zimbabwean political process to President Jacob Zuma’s incoming team.
By the time the Pretoria team, with presidential International Affairs Adviser Lindiwe Zulu on point, had got its hands on the issues, Mugabe’s illegal and unilateral appointments had been entrenched for three years, and the MDC had other, more substantial, problems to address.
The key MDC delivery ministries, education and health, have nevertheless made visible progress in undoing the damage wrought by two decades of solo Zanu-PF rule.
There are more than 7 000 state schools. More than 90% were closed, or abandoned, or open but without learning or teaching, when the inclusive government was sworn in to power.
The non-salary budget allocation of US$66-million (of which US$14,2-million was actually disbursed by Biti), was to be used for minimal school maintenance and rebuilds of a few of the most devastated schools, particularly ablution facilities, science equipment, and curriculum development.
There were no textbooks available in most schools at the end of Zanu-PF’s rule which ended when the inclusive government was sworn into power in February 2009. Western donors paid for a massive distribution of new textbooks in 2010 and 2011.
The health sector, slightly less damaged by Mugabe’s hyperinflation, and with more to play with – US$48-million of a theoretical US$132-million – has fared better. In the past month foreign donors have underwritten free healthcare for pregnant women and children under five.
The security ministries, by contrast, are able to draw down up to 83% of their already-significant allocations, as does Mugabe’s office, which in 2011 also actually received more than health and education combined. The US$79-million he received does not include the massive cost of the Central Intelligence Organisation (CIO). The CIO is run directly from the presidency on a budget over which Parliament exercises no oversight.
His 2011 allocation finances the minimal costs for the Cabinet office, vehicles for 38 members of the Cabinet, and tip-offs for a vast network of informers, and Mugabe’s own huge travel costs for 2011 which ran to about half of the US$45-million spent on travel by government officials.
Mugabe made eight trips to Singapore in 2011, was the only head of state at the UN’s youth summit in New York mid-year, attends each and every meeting to which he is invited or is available to him as head of state around the world and in the region, and usually travels with a contingent of between 30-60 officials, all drawing down handsome per diems from the Treasury (up to US$1 500 a day). Mugabe himself takes US$10 000 a day.
Another key Zanu-PF controlled ministry is Justice. Its non-salary actuals for 2011 – US$32-million – was higher than that for education. This ministry plays a key role in Zanu-PF’s unremitting assault on the MDC, spending freely to generate criminal charges with no possibility of conviction. Hundreds of MDC-M’s officials and members are charged each year with a wide range of largely petty offences. None of the charges so far in 2011 have been successfully prosecuted.
It is also necessary for Justice Minister Patrick Chinamasa to keep his crew of largely-incompetent and partisan judges of the higher courts satisfied, even though the Supreme Court in particular has set some kind of regional record for its failure to deliver judgments – some remain pending for more than three years.
A smaller-scale scandal is the amount spent by the prime minister’s office, excluding salaries. Tsvangirai’s office received US$10,6-million for himself, and deputy prime ministers Thoko Khupe and Arthur Mutambara.
Travel by the three, particularly Mutambara, gobbled up a significant part of the 2011 budget. The PM office is a post-GPA cost centre, and therefore inherited no Zanu-PF bureaucrats. This explains the far higher percentage of actual funding, compared to established ministries like health and education with their hordes of Zanu-PF bureaucrats.
Despite the absence of Zanu-PF mandarins, the PM’s office is among the most disorganised in Harare. Among its routine functions is a weekly Council of Ministers’ meeting, chaired by Tsvangirai. These meetings, formally recognised in the GPA and scheduled every Thursday, are intended to offset Mugabe’s Tuesday Cabinet meetings. Just eight have actually taken place this year. Tsvangirai’s own MDC ministers no longer bother to turn up on Tuesdays.
Biti runs a cash economy from tax collections and regularly a proportion of disbursements cannot be paid on demand. The Treasury is regularly short of cash and so regular drawdowns are sometimes partial, sometimes delayed.
He also inherited a clutch of Zanu-PF bureaucrats. Observers say Biti is clearly nervous to delay or refuse claims from Zanu-PF security ministers. MDC social ministers suffer in consequence, catching the short end of the pay-out stick.
In September at a small rally in Harare Biti frankly acknowledged that participation of his ministry in the inclusive administration had shown him that implementation of policies depended on bureaucrats, and that the MDC had not understood the power of this Zanu-PF bloc before entering the inclusive government.
Some failure to access revenue is caused by obstruction from Zanu-PF bureaucrats, and some from chronic lack of capacity, particularly at provincial levels, to put in claims and adhere to processes.
The health and education sectors in particular have made the most dramatic and visible recovery in the aftermath of the pre-2009 Zanu-PF disaster.
The public was anxious for these two sectors to recover quickly. They did, to a point.
Schools and clinics reopened. Both ministers have attracted significant donor support and Education Minister David Coltart, in particular, has injected enormous energy into not only getting the schools back, but has embarked on several key new policies – which he can’t get implemented through lack of access to allocated funds.
Education and Health’s battle to secure the funds allocated also appears to be part of a conscious Zanu-PF election strategy: Zanu-PF cannot afford to allow health and education to do well for the MDC.
Zimbabwe Independent
By Dzikamai Bere
8 December 2011
Societies emerging from a legacy of massive human rights violations are torn between fear and hope. What must be done with the ugly past? Should it be confronted, or should it be buried forever? This is the challenge that confronts Zimbabwe’s coalition government as it prepares for the next election. Is Zimbabwe ready to confront the question of truth? The Standard of May 1 reported that President Robert Mugabe had “pledged†to set up a team to look into Gukurahundi (Midlands and Matabeleland atrocities) and map the way forward. This is yet to happen.
Gukurahundi still stands out as the worst of the many atrocities committed by the government or people acting with its blessings in independent Zimbabwe. There have been many discussions around Gukurahundi and other atrocities in Zimbabwe.
In March 2010, Zanu PF MPs walked out of parliament after their colleagues from the MDC-T proposed an investigation into the Matabeleland atrocities. In the same month, the Zimbabwe Republic Police in Bulawayo shut down an exhibition on Gukurahundi by artist Owen Maseko. Maseko was arrested and spent the weekend in cells. In November 2010, war veterans’ leader Joseph Chinotimba demanded that minister David Coltart apologises for calling Gukurahundi“genocideâ€.
Zimbabwe’s coalition government is mandated to ensure democratisation and economic stability. One of the things that have occupied the thoughts of the Zimbabwean people is the need to recover the truth of what happened in our past as a way of building sustainable peace.
The intellectual discourse is flooded with theories on dealing with the past. In February 2009, the Organ on National Healing, Reconciliation and Integration was formed with the mandate to advice government properly on how to deal with the past. The Organ has remained largely unknown to its constituency, ignorant of its mandate and its ministers discordant in matters of policy regarding national healing.
Civil society has tried to fill in the gap.
The Law Society of Zimbabwe (LSZ) as part of its contribution to the constitution-making process in Zimbabwe produced its model constitution towards the end of 2010. In this model, LSZ addresses the issue of truth and suggests the creation of a commission to recover the truth and facilitate reconciliation.
In August 2011, the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum published the findings of a nationwide survey on transitional justice. According to the report, 83% of the respondents believe that victims of political violence should be rehabilitated through counselling, reparations, prosecution of perpetrators, truth recovery and apologies from the perpetrators. In short, the people are saying, “Let’s deal with it!â€
Many sectors have made similar recommendations both locally and internationally. The government has responded by accusing those pushing for truth recovery of trying to turn back the clock or “opening old woundsâ€. Is it? Maybe.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Chairperson of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), writes in the foreword to the TRC Report:
“However painful the experience, the wounds of the past must not be allowed to fester. They must be opened. They must be cleansed. And balm must be poured on them so they can heal.
This is not to be obsessed with the past. It is to take care that the past is properly dealt with for the sake of the future.â€
There are no illusions about the achievements of the South African TRC or any other truth commission. Since the formation of the first truth commission in Uganda in 1974, over 45 truth commissions have been instituted the world over in an attempt to recover the truth and foster reconciliation. There are thousands of disillusioned victims who have no kind words for these commissions. However, the achievements cannot be ignored. Their failures are nowhere outside the realms of humanity.
What we can learn from all these efforts at recovering the truth, especially from our southern neighbours, is that there are times in the history of a society when men and women have to be brave enough to confront the question of truth, truthfully. It takes courage and determination; and that was the magic of Nelson Mandela. He confronted it.
Since the 1990s, there seem to have been an explosion of the search for truth. Individuals and societies hunger for truth. The world has moved along this overwhelming demand for truth. The generations are anxious. It is part of the global transition from repression towards more accountable and transparent governance. This world movement is difficult to ignore.
On March 24 2011, the Secretary General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon launched the International Day for the Right to the Truth of Victims of Gross Human Rights Violations and for the Dignity of Victims. On September 29 2011, the UN Human Rights Council passed a resolution (A/HRC/18/L22) providing for the appointment of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence. Truth commissions have been set up in Brazil, Sri-Lanka, and the Ivory Coast, to mention but a few. In the process, international law is taking the same complexion, international and regional courts are becoming less tolerant of those who block the rights of victims to know the truth.
The impact of truth commissions is much more than recovering a record of the past and making recommendations. It is a recovery of humanity itself by allowing societies to reflect collectively on the choices they made in the past. It is retracing our memory to find out where exactly we lost our soul. Commissions are facilitating participation of societies in governance in a more consultative, engaging and transparent manner. Democracy is evolving rapidly. It is not just about open debate; it is also about community dialogue. It is not just about the casting of ballots after five years and thereafter let politicians decide what happens to our everyday life.
Governments are challenged to open wide the windows and doors to allow for more citizen participation in what happens every day. With this growing movement of participative governance, which will soon intensify with the setting up of a UN working group on the question of truth, can Zimbabwe continue to shy away from the truth? What is at stake?
Opening up the Pandora’s box is more than just a question of truth and memory. It is a matter of increased citizen involvement in governance. Our future is too important to be left to spin doctors. Zimbabwe is lagging behind; its leaders are going against the tide of history. We must now open the doors and confront critical questions, including the question of truth.
The Standard
By Patrice Makova
4 December 2011
The leader of the smaller faction of the MDC, Professor Welshman Ncube has cast doubt on the prospects of the early completion of the constitution-making process to pave way for elections, saying political parties were still quarreling over several issues.
This is compounded by the fact that a national report compiled by the 17 thematic committees has been rejected for lack of depth and clarity, he said.
But Constitutional Select Committee (Copac) co-chairperson, Douglas Mwonzora dismissed Ncube’s assertion accusing him of attempting to discredit the current process in order to “sneak in†the controversial and much discredited Kariba draft constitution.
Speaking at a Southern Africa Political Economy Series (SAPES) Trust Policy dialogue in Harare last week, Ncube said the constitution-making process has been thrown into a shambles after Copac rejected the national report which drafters were supposed to use for crafting the new supreme law of the country.
He said political parties had to recall their representatives to rewrite the national report as the current one was badly written and lacked thoroughness.
“The process of writing a new constitution is far from over, but we do not want to admit this openly,†said Ncube.
“Zimbabweans have been given a false impression that the country is ready to draft a new constitution. You can bring in the drafting people, but what can they do if there is nothing to draft?†he asked.
“There is so much that has not been done. I always say this; the likelihood of holding a constitutional referendum and election in the same year is highly improbable — that it can be safely dismissed,†said Ncube.
“Up to now, not even a single line or paragraph of the constitution has been written. It is unlikely that the text would be ready by August next year. We will be lucky to hold a referendum by October next year.â€
Ncube said even when the referendum is held and a constitution agreed upon, up to three additional months would be required to negotiate and amend the electoral act to make provision for issues such as proportional representation, which were likely to be included in the new supreme law.
Mwonzora however said the work produced by the select committee was of high standard, contrary to Ncube’s claims. He said talks of a national report were premature, as such a document would only be ready when everything else has been put in place, up to the production of the draft constitution.
“It appears Professor Ncube badly misses being part of Copac,†said Mwonzora.
“We get a little bit worried when some people who wrote the Kariba draft start criticising the process. They are trying to rubbish the current process as a way of trying to sneak in the Kariba draft as a substitute draft constitution.â€
He said Copac concluded compiling the constitution principles at a meeting attended by David Coltart and Edward Mkhosi from Professor Ncube’s MDC.
Zanu PF secretary for information and publicity Rugare Gumbo also insisted that the constitution-making process was going on well, with the three parties to the GPA agreeable on 95% of the issues.
“Our (Zanu PF) position and that of President Mugabe is clear that elections will be held early next year, meaning that the constitution has to be completed now,†said Gumbo.
“The likes of Professor Ncube want to delay the process in order to remain in power. He is coming up with excuses in order to make hay while the sun still shines.â€
Gumbo said it was not necessary to do a land audit before the next elections, as any party which comes into power could do that at a later stage.
Problems have been dogging Zimbabwe’s constitution-making process, which was supposed to have been completed within 18 months after the formation of the coalition government.
This was however delayed due to disruptions and disagreements by the coalition partners.
Constitution-making process done secretly: Ncube
Ncube said the constitution-making process was fraught with secrecy and as a result people were not aware of what came out during the public outreaches.
He said the Constitutional Commission which drafted the rejected constitutional draft in 2000 was more open in its work as it managed to publicise provincial reports, unlike the current process which is shrouded in secrecy.
The MDC leader said political parties were still quarrelling over what to include on the pre-amble of the new constitution, while fundamental differences still existed on several issues such as devolution of power and dual citizenship.
The Standard
4 December 2011
Education has been at the core of national discourse since colonial days. Seen as the only way of getting out grinding poverty and joining the national economy black Zimbabweans craved it.
During colonial days missionaries came and built mission schools all over the country to accommodate boys and girls who would otherwise have been excluded from the education system by the racially-segregative colonial education system. As the saying goes, everyone who is anybody in Zimbabwe was educated by missionaries.
But even missionary education did not come entirely free; though heavily subsidised by donations from parent churches in Europe and America, parents still had to chip in with something. At Independence in 1980 the new black government, driven by its revolutionary zeal, introduced free primary education.
Lauded for this the world-over — Zimbabwe at one stage achieved 98% literacy — no one ever raised the question of sustainability.
The country has now reached a stage where it is now patently clear that free education cannot be sustained. After decades of bad governance and skewed policies driven by populism the country’s coffers are empty. In the past decade less and less money has been channelled towards the social services sector particularly education and health.
The Minister of Education, David Coltart, was last week quoted saying a school-fees hike next year was inevitable; this has sent thousands of parents panicking.
There is every reason to panic; most of these parents are already struggling to keep their children in school. Most affected would naturally be children living in marginalised areas such as farms and communal areas where people depend only on subsistence agriculture.
The urban poor will also be affected. Thousands of children will drop out of school to join the vicious cycle of unemployment, prostitution and forced migration.
It is now time to look holistically at the education sector and come up with interventions that will stop its regression back to the colonial days. Underlining this process should be the clear message that parents will be called upon to play a more and more critical role in the education of their children.